|
1
|
- Michael Karmis, Stonie Barker Professor
- Department of Mining and Minerals Engineering and Director,
Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research
- Virginia Tech, USA
|
|
2
|
- Status of the Global Minerals Industry
- The Status of the Global Minerals Education
- Concerns, Challenges and Opportunities
- Revitalization of the Minerals Education Infrastructure
- SME Mineral Education Sustainability Task Force
- The Role of the Society of Mining Professors (SOMP)
|
|
3
|
- Demand for Minerals (output/prices continue to rise!)
- Environmental Pressures and Demands
- Minerals Production and Sustainable Development
- Globalization of the Minerals Industry
- Privatization/Concentration of Mining Activities
- The Global Divide: Industrialized v. Developing Nations
- Large Producers v. Small/Artisanal Mines
- The Role of Industrial Minerals, Aggregates and Construction Materials
- Importance of Minerals Processing
- Need for a Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Mining
|
|
4
|
- Copper consumption estimated to increase 5% and refined copper
production 6.4%
- The spot market for gold has reached a 14-year high due to geopolitical
uncertainties and the weak dollar - - demand greater than supply!
- Coal is expected to reach new production records, to keep pace with
electricity demands and GDP gains - - coal prices record high this year
and export markets reinvigorated
- The substantial budget increases of global exploration activities is the
most significant indicators of the recent impressive performance of the
minerals sector, and more importantly, of its positive outlook for the
future!
|
|
5
|
- Research must be continuously undertaken to meet the future technology
needs of the industry. This was
recognized in the MMSD (2002) process and the subsequent Toronto
Declaration:
- –Research and technology are vital to this initiative [i.e. SD] if the
mining industry is to keep or be granted a “social license” to operate
- Future technological advances require a significant infusion of public
and private funds
- R&D programmes must be accomplished through cooperative efforts
between government, industry and the various mineral schools around the
world
- This requires viewing the traditional mining universities both as
educational resources and as centers of excellence for the development
of new technologies
|
|
6
|
- Community-Wide Crisis
- Shortage at all Levels
- Regional/Sectoral Demographics
- Aging Work Force and Retirements
- Human Resources Development
|
|
7
|
- Preserve and maintain the basic knowledge
- Create new ideas, philosophies, arts and technologies
- Recruit and retain highly qualified teachers and researchers
- Educate/train post-baccalaureate and post-doctoral students
- Attract supplemental funds and other resources, equipment and facilities
- Transfer new concepts and technologies to industries and governmental
agencies
- Foster the competitive position for national economies in the world
marketplace
- Provide education in a “state-of-the-art” atmosphere
- Contribute to distributed education and “web-learning”
|
|
8
|
- A minerals education crisis, or at least serious concern (there are good
news later!)
- Some historic mining schools have terminated minerals programs
- The “survivors”, in both developed and developing countries, are under
pressure and scrutiny
- Globally, minerals engineering programs represent a sub-critical mass of
effort that, without adequate support, may deny the industry and the
community technical and professional manpower within a few years.
- Numerous factors have contributed to this decline:
|
|
9
|
- Student recruitment and retention
- According to a survey, students offered the following reasons for lack
of interest in the field:
- Image (a sunset industry!)
- Lack of professionalism
- Size and academic reputation of the discipline
- Job location
- Starting salaries
- Lack of career development interest by employers (students are “seeking
a career not a job”)
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- The limited research funding by industry and government has been a
serious threat to the sustainability of post-graduate programs
- Recruitment and support of qualified post-graduate students is
competitive across fields
- Related disciplines with broader appeal, better funding and, possibly,
more rewarding careers are successfully recruiting from the same pool.
- The opposite is not happening!
|
|
12
|
- The continuous decline of minerals education had a significant impact in
the recruitment, retention and development of the “professorate”
- The staff issue becomes even more critical when looking at the
demographics of the profession
- The vast majority of the academic staff in minerals programs is at the
senior level, posing serious succession and continuity problems
- Since the post-graduate pipeline is also decreasing, a serious crisis is
developing
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Vision: Promote sustainability of minerals education through improved
collaboration between industry, academia and government
- Goals:
- Provide a forum for industry, government and educators to discuss
long-term sustainability
- Attempt to develop a forecast of the minerals engineering and economic
geology graduates
- Explore what government and industry can do to assist the minerals
education programs
- Socialize the issue so all stakeholders can be a part of the solution
- Participants:
- - Industry - Academia - Government - SME
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- 13 (all remaining programs responding)
- 69 tenured or tenure track faculty members
- 24% expect to retire in next 5 years (approx time for current freshmen
to graduate)
- Half expect to retire in next 10 years
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- We need to attract at least 3 times more students
- Recruiting students is the most critical sustainability issue
- Over 25% of the mining graduates choose other career paths – Why?
- We need 10 viable Mining Schools to ensure ABET accreditation and
regional presence to the industry
- We need at least 10 new Ph.D.’s graduating each year in Mining
Engineering to replace retiring faculty
- Ph.D’s with specialties in Ventilation and Mining Methods are most
critical in the next 5 years
- Research funding is needed to ensure adequate numbers of faculty in
areas of diminishing expertise
- “External” funding to support infrastructure $2 million/school/year
- Industry must play a prominent role in promoting minerals education to
government leaders and academic administrators
|
|
25
|
- Select one or more mining schools to support and address sustainability
issues
- Provide senior employees to school “Advisory Boards,” offer
scholarships, internships and identify mentors
- Supply resources to mining schools to help them recruit new students
- Lobby State and Federal legislators, Regents, and University
Administrators on the importance of keeping the remaining mining schools
funded
- Use company lobbyists to explore Federal funding for mining schools as
“strategic” to US Security
|
|
26
|
- Company Funding
- Federal (National) Lobbying
- Committee Emphasis for 2005/06
- The Annual 2006 SME Program
- The 2006 Forum
|
|
27
|
- Newmont committed to supporting Mackay, an important source of talent to
company’s “Social license” in Nevada
- Donation of $500k per year, for 5 years was developed jointly with the
Director of Mackay, and includes funding for the following:
- Salary for a faculty in Minerals Engineering and the beginning of an
endowment for this chair. Other
Nevada mining companies have added to this endowment. Goal: $2 M
- Salary for a faculty to teach GIS
- Undergraduate scholarships and graduate research
- Undergraduate recruiting
- Student travel, labs, K-12 education, the minerals museum
|
|
28
|
- EMSRA provides funds for existing programs at accredited petroleum and
mining schools, applied geology and geophysics programs
- EMSRA funds individuals for degrees in petroleum, mining engineering,
mining geology, geophysics and mineral economics
- Approved by the House Committee on Resources and passed this month by
the Full House. The Senate is
next!
- What EMSRA does:
- Makes it national policy to preserve and foster the human capital
necessary for National economic, energy and minerals security
- Declares that petroleum, mining, applied geology and
geophysics schools, which produce the human capital are
national assets, should be assisted with Federal funds
- Creates funding to maintain and encourage the growth of the energy and
minerals workforce to meet the national needs
- Focuses on the exploration and production of energy and mineral
resources
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- The "Societät der Bergbaukunde" (Society of Mining Sciences)
was established in Schemnitz by Ignaz Von Born in 1786
- The first international professional/scientific society
- Membership included many notable scientists of the era (Sir Humphrey
Davy)
- The Society developed branches and offices in 15 countries and, at its
peak, listed 154 members
- After the death of Von Born in 1791, the Society begun to fold
|
|
32
|
- In 1990, in light of the imminent changes to European laws on degree
recognition within the EU a new "Societät der Bergbaukunde"
was re-established under the name of "Society of Mining Professors
(SOMP)”.
- This initiative was lead by Professor Gunther Fettweis, who proposed the
formation of the Society during the 150th anniversary of the
Montanuniversität Leoben
- The SOMP was formed in 1990 with some 70 members, representing 39 mining
faculties (or colleges) in 27 countries (mainly in Europe).
|
|
33
|
- Develop a common mining engineering curriculum:
- Comparison of 109 curricula from 96 universities in 49 countries
- Recommendations on minimum content for agreed subjects for establishing
a basic curriculum
- Agreement on core subjects, while preserving time for “electives” and
national identity
- Identify institutions, worldwide offering a degree in mining engineering
- 270 institutions in 84 countries!
|
|
34
|
- Networking and Collaboration
- Annual General Meetings and Topical meetings
- Educational Programs
- European Mining Course (1996)
- European Geotechnical and Environmental Course (2004)
- Research Programs
- Public Outreach Programs
- SD and “The Milos Declaration” (2003)
|
|
35
|
- Global discussion to transform and position the Society of Mining
Professors/Societät der Bergbaukunde as the premier voice of the
academic minerals disciplines
- SOMP should be a vibrant global Society, representing the majority of
minerals academics and should make a significant contribution to a
sustainable future
- The main goal of the Society should be to “protect and guarantee the
scientific, technical, academic and professional knowledge required to
ensure a sustainable supply of minerals for mankind”
|
|
36
|
- To ensure that university-based education at the highest level, in
the minerals disciplines, can be
sustained.
- To ensure that advancement through research, of the scientific and
engineering knowledge in the areas of relevance to the provision of
mineral resources continues.
- To establish a network of academics involved in achieving the above
goals.
- To enhance the image of the minerals-producing industries, promote
development of educational courses within these disciplines and foster
pride in the disciplines.
- To establish and maintain ongoing contacts with the global mineral
industry.
- To promote co-operation in education and research and identify
co-operative opportunities.
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Commitment of the global minerals community to encourage and support
university-based education, at the highest level
- Recognition that research on the engineering knowledge for mineral
production must be adequately supported
- Encouragement of the community in pursuing global academic networks that
can work jointly and co-operatively
- Exploring new ways of learning, attracting non-traditional students and
participating in distributed educational schemes
- Engagement with SD concepts and processes
- Involvement with SOMP to pursue a global vision and ensure that
university-based minerals education can be sustained
- Addressing the issue of public image of the minerals-producing
industries and fostering pride in the disciplines
|